The research project attempted in
this chapter is very similar to much of the research I have seen concerning the
attempt to make classrooms “multi-cultural” and “diverse”. I think it is
interesting, however, that they used this paradigm in order to teach, in a
lower income, minority school, the concept of critical thinking on issues of
cultural diversity and the struggles inherent in a system that, even after all
our efforts in the past 20-30 years, still fails to adapt a pedagogy that can
be applied equitably to any cultural, financial or other diverse background.
Most
interesting to me in the article is the concept shared by the authors, but
apparently coined by Freire and Macedo, that being the “dialectical
relationship between reading the world and reading the word, where readings of
the word informed readings of the world in a dialectic cycle.” This fascinates
me because it expresses eloquently the way that I view reading of any kind. Reading
anything, rather literary, informational or just for entertainment, should be
used to help the reader better understand their world, and become a more
integral part of it. Furthermore, having become a part of their world, the
reader can use what they experience in it to better access any reading they may
come across. Learning to bring this concept into the minds of students and help
them understand that reading is not about words, it’s about ideas is why I have
endeavored to become an educator. I want my students to see all the various
thoughts expressed by so many authors of so many different backgrounds so that
they may use those ideas as a springboard to become thinkers themselves. To
look at everything they come across, rather in reading, or in the real world,
with a critical eye and a desire to find the truth, or lack thereof at the
center of any idea they come across.
No comments:
Post a Comment